Court Martial Appeal Court

Decision Information

Decision Content

Date: 20191106


Docket: CMAC-598

Citation: 2019 CMAC 5

CORAM:

CHIEF JUSTICE BELL

MOSLEY J.A.

SCANLAN J.A.

 

 

 

BETWEEN:

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Appellant

and

LIEUTENANT J.C. BANTING

Respondent

Heard at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 28, 2019.

Judgment delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 28, 2019 and edited for syntax and grammar with added reference to the relevant case law.


Date: 20191106


Docket: CMAC-598

Citation: 2019 CMAC 5

CORAM:

CHIEF JUSTICE BELL

MOSLEY J.A.

SCANLAN J.A.

 

 

 

BETWEEN:

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

Appellant

and

LIEUTENANT J.C. BANTING

Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

[1]  The panel is unanimous that this appeal should be dismissed. In R. v. Banting, 2019 CM 2009, Military Judge Sukstorf correctly applied the law as it relates to the failure to establish a prima facie case. We share her view there was no evidence presented at the trial upon which a reasonable panel of a General Court Martial, properly instructed, could return a guilty verdict.

[2]  We dismiss the appeal.

“B. Richard Bell”

Chief Justice

“Richard G. Mosley”

J.A.

J.E. Scanlan”

J.A.


COURT MARTIAL APPEAL COURT OF CANADA

NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD


DOCKET:

CMAC-598

 

STYLE OF CAUSE:

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN v. LIEUTENANT J.C. BANTING

 

 

PLACE OF HEARING:

Ottawa, Ontario

 

DATE OF HEARING:

October 28, 2019

 

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:

THE COURT

 

DATED:

NOVEMBER 6, 2019

 

APPEARANCES:

Lieutenant-Colonel Dominic Martin,

Major Stephan Poitras

 

For The Appellant

 

Mr. Joshua M. Juneau

 

For The Respondent

 

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

Military Prosecution Service

Ottawa, Ontario

 

For The Appellant

 

Michel Drapeau Law Office

Ottawa, Ontario

 

For The Respondent

 

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.